Parent maintenance cases ‘often down to strained ties’

Article extracted from: http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/parent-maintenance-cases-often-down-to-strained-ties

Author: Theresa Tan

Publication Date: 6 December 2015


 

Deep-seated anger and resentment are often at the root of why some children do not support their elderly parents, who have to haul them to court to get maintenance.

The parent may have abandoned, abused or neglected his children when they were young, Mr Khoo Oon Soo, Commissioner for the Maintenance of Parents (CMP), told The Sunday Times.

For instance, the parent could have been hooked on gambling, alcohol or other vices and failed to support his family. Or he could have been unfaithful, with another family on the side.

Mr Khoo said: “The children have harboured anger and resentment for many years. They feel that, since my dad walked out on the family, why should I support him now?”

Another reason for strained ties is that the child feels the parent has favoured another child, usually a son.

KEEP FLAT AS A BACKUP PLAN

My advice to the elderly is: Never sell your flat. If anything happens, you still have a flat to fall back on.

MR KHOO OON SOO, Commissioner for the Maintenance of Parents

Mr Khoo said it is common to see seniors sell their flats and use the proceeds to help their sons buy a bigger house. But they are later asked, or choose, to leave their son’s house when tensions arise.

So they turn to their other children for support. But the other children feel the son should take up that responsibility, since he had benefited from the sale of the parent’s flat.

Mr Khoo said: “My advice to the elderly is: Never sell your flat. If anything happens, you still have a flat to fall back on.”

The conflicts between daughters- or sons-in-law and the elderly are another reason why their children do not support them, Mr Khoo said.

According to the Ageing Families in Singapore report released last month by the Ministry of Social and Family Development, fewer parents are turning to the CMP in recent years. Last year, 213 seniors went to the CMP to seek maintenance from their children, down from 257 in 2013 and 303 in 2012.

One possibility behind the fall in numbers, Mr Khoo said, is because the Government’s Social Service Offices (SSOs) are referring fewer seniors to the CMP.

Social workers explain that seniors who ask the SSO for financial aid are usually given short-term help. SSO staff will usually ask these elderly folk to explore the possibility of getting maintenance from their children through the CMP.

Social workers say most parents would not go to the CMP to get their child to support them, unless they have no other means of survival.

Many fear this would worsen – or even sever – their strained ties with their child. Already, most are not on talking terms and some have not had any contact with their children for decades.

Mrs Chua Yixin, senior social worker at Trans Safe Centre, said: “For Asians, they feel ashamed that their children are not supporting them. They don’t want to wash their dirty linen in public.”

Since 2011, seniors asking for maintenance have to go to the CMP, which is not a court setting, first for mediation.

“There are always two sides to a story and we will listen to both sides,” Mr Khoo said. “We will mediate to try to get both sides to come to a sum they can agree on.”

If this conciliatory approach fails, the parent can take the dispute to the Tribunal for the Maintenance of Parents (TMP), which is considered a court.

Eight in 10 cases are resolved successfully at the CMP, Mr Khoo said, and the children usually give between $100 and $300 a month.

Most of the parents come from low-income backgrounds, with close to half living in one- or two-room flats. On average, six in 10 who ask for maintenance are fathers.

While they may decide to give maintenance after mediation, most children do not reconcile with their parents, Mr Khoo noted.

One example of how a relationship can deteriorate relates to Mary, a 70-year-old divorcee who has four children in their 40s. She lives alone in a one-room rental flat and used to work as a part-time waitress, earning about $500 monthly.

“My children hate me. My ex-husband brainwashed them against me,” she said. “He was always suspecting me of having boyfriends outside, which is not true.”

Last year, she went to the CMP to ask for $100 from each of her children to help her with her living expenses. They refused. But she decided not to press the matter further, hoping to preserve their relationships. But the damage has been done. She said: “Now, they don’t even want to talk to me or answer my calls.”


Further Remarks

An overview of the Maintenance of Parents Act can be found at http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/articles/SIP_1614_2009-11-30.html. Some salient points include:

  • The purpose of the bill is to provide a safety net for needy and neglected parents who had no other recourse, and although there was no urgent need at the time, the nation needed to prepare to cope with an increasingly aging population.
  • Citizens above the age of 60 who are unable to maintain themselves adequately are entitled to claim maintenance from their children
  • Under the Tribunal for the Maintenance of Parents, conciliation officers will review every case and mediate between both parties. If the mediation fails, the case will be heard at the tribunal.
  • The amount of maintenance of be paid is decided by the tribunal based on a set of criteria, including: financial needs, earning capacity, expenses incurred and the physical health of the parent and children
  • The maintenance claim may be dismissed if the children can prove that they were abused, neglected or abandoned by their parents when they were young.

This article contains a lot of great points about:

  • Family
  • The problem with the government’s usage of it as a social safety net
  • Sociocultural reasons for reluctance to turn to government institutions to uphold the law

Questions to ponder:

  • Can the state intervene in individuals’ private (subjective) affairs?
  • Has the Maintenance of Parents Act achieved its original purpose?
  • Should the state always represent the immediate interests of the people, or should it set greater norms for the people to aspire towards?
  • (Why) Are children morally obliged to care for their parents?

Post by: Ng Min

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s